Which prediction is commonly associated with Neo-Malthusian theories?

Neo-Malthusian theories extend the ideas of Thomas Malthus, who argued that population growth tends to outpace agricultural production, leading to inevitable shortages of resources. The Neo-Malthusian perspective emphasizes the potential for resource depletion, particularly in the face of increasing population growth and consumption patterns. This theory posits that as resources become scarcer, competition for these resources intensifies, potentially leading to conflicts among nations and groups that vie for limited supplies.

In this context, the notion of resource depletion suggests that critical resources such as water, arable land, and energy sources may not be sustainable in the long run. As these resources dwindle or become more difficult to access, tensions may rise, leading to conflict over their possession and control. Neo-Malthusians stress the urgency of addressing these issues through sustainable practices, population control, and enhanced resource management to avoid scenarios where conflict becomes the primary outcome of resource scarcity.

The other predictions, while relevant to discussions about population and resources, do not align directly with the Neo-Malthusian focus on conflict arising from resource limitations. Increased cooperation among nations and technological advancements in food production could serve as counterpoints to Neo-Malthusian predictions, suggesting solutions rather than conflicts. Similarly,