What type of dispute is most commonly associated with antecedent boundaries?

Antecedent boundaries are those that were established before any significant human imprints were made on the landscape, often based on physical features like rivers or mountain ranges. These types of boundaries can lead to positional disputes, which arise when parties disagree over the precise location of a boundary that has already been established.

In this context, positional disputes are particularly likely with antecedent boundaries because the natural features used to define these boundaries can shift over time due to erosion, sediment deposition, or other environmental changes. As a result, the interpretation of where the boundary lies can become contentious, especially if the involved parties have differing opinions about the physical features in question.

This historical context makes it clear why positional disputes are the most common ones associated with antecedent boundaries, as these disputes hinge on the interpretation and enforcement of the boundary's exact placement rather than on disagreements about the existence or legitimacy of the boundary itself.